<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The crass realities of Avatar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dreamflesh.com/blog/2010/01/crass-realities-avatar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dreamflesh.com/blog/2010/01/crass-realities-avatar/</link>
	<description>Ecological crisis and archaeologies of consciousness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 11:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merrick</title>
		<link>http://dreamflesh.com/blog/2010/01/crass-realities-avatar/comment-page-1/#comment-9276</link>
		<dc:creator>Merrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 17:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dreamflesh.com/?p=845#comment-9276</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that, Gyrus. Personally i loved those one-liners about the only thing worse than looking bad for killing the indigenous is having a bad quarterly balance sheet.

On the &#039;killing the indigenous looks bad&#039;, it reminds me of something in corporate Watch&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.corporatewatch.org/publications/corporate_structures.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Corporate Law and Structures&lt;/a&gt; report:

&lt;i&gt;For most people, economic values are secondary, and social and to a lesser extent environmental values come first: making money is good but only if it doesn’t conflict with believing it’s wrong to murder, steal or cut down virgin rainforest.

For the corporate ‘environmentalist’, profit is absolute, social and environmental values are relative: their first aim is to make as much money as possible, but given two ways to make that money they choose the one that requires the least murder, blatant theft or environmental destruction. Then they pat themselves on the back for being so responsible.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that, Gyrus. Personally i loved those one-liners about the only thing worse than looking bad for killing the indigenous is having a bad quarterly balance sheet.</p>
<p>On the &#8216;killing the indigenous looks bad&#8217;, it reminds me of something in corporate Watch&#8217;s <a href="http://archive.corporatewatch.org/publications/corporate_structures.pdf" >Corporate Law and Structures</a> report:</p>
<p><i>For most people, economic values are secondary, and social and to a lesser extent environmental values come first: making money is good but only if it doesn’t conflict with believing it’s wrong to murder, steal or cut down virgin rainforest.</p>
<p>For the corporate ‘environmentalist’, profit is absolute, social and environmental values are relative: their first aim is to make as much money as possible, but given two ways to make that money they choose the one that requires the least murder, blatant theft or environmental destruction. Then they pat themselves on the back for being so responsible.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  dreamflesh.com/blog/2010/01/crass-realities-avatar/feed/ ) in 0.25262 seconds, on May 24th, 2012 at 4:06 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2012 at 5:06 am UTC -->
